There is a pervasive narrative in mainstream media and progressive circles that portrays the pro-life movement as rabid, violent, and dangerous to abortion providers. News coverage frequently emphasizes historical incidents of anti-abortion extremism while ignoring or minimizing contemporary violence perpetrated by pro-abortion activists. However, when examining the full historical context alongside recent data, a more complex picture emerges—one that challenges the assumption that violence is a one-sided phenomenon in the abortion debate.
Must See Also: The Challenges of Pro-Life Nonprofit Organizations
The Violent Pro-Abortion Movement: Jane’s Revenge and Post-Dobbs Attacks on Pro-Life Centers
Formation and Ideology of the Violent Pro-Abortion Movement
In stark contrast to the historical anti-abortion violence narrative, a new form of militant abortion-rights extremism emerged in 2022. Jane’s Revenge was a militant, extremist abortion-rights group that encouraged and claimed responsibility for acts of firebombing, vandalism, and arson targeting crisis pregnancy centers, churches, and congressional offices across the United States.
The group formed in direct response to the May 2, 2022 leak of a draft Supreme Court opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which indicated the Court would overturn Roe v. Wade. On May 8, 2022, Jane’s Revenge posted its “First Communiqué” after firebombing a crisis pregnancy center in Madison, Wisconsin, declaring:
“This was only a warning. We demand the disbanding of all anti-choice establishments, fake clinics, and violent anti-choice groups within the next thirty days. This is not a mere ‘difference of opinion’ as some have framed it. We are literally fighting for our lives… As you continue to bomb clinics and assassinate doctors with impunity, so too shall we adopt increasingly extreme tactics.”
This manifesto explicitly threatened escalating violence and drew a false equivalence between historical anti-abortion violence and contemporary pro-life advocacy, using past extremism to justify present-day terrorism.
Must See Also: Christian PayPal Alternatives: Supporting Your Beliefs Through Secure Payments
The Violent Pro-Abortion Movement: Documented Jane’s Revenge Attacks
Between May and July 2022, Jane’s Revenge carried out or claimed responsibility for dozens of attacks against pro-life pregnancy resource centers and churches across the United States:
May 8, 2022: Madison, Wisconsin – Jane’s Revenge firebombed the offices of Wisconsin Family Action, marking the group’s first publicly claimed attack.
May 14, 2022: Reisterstown, Maryland – The Alpha Pregnancy Center was vandalized with the messages “Jane’s Revenge” and “If abortions aren’t safe neither are you.”
May 25, 2022: Lynnwood, Washington – Anti-life activists smashed windows and vandalized Next Steps Pregnancy Services with the threat, “If abortion isn’t safe, you aren’t either.”
May 30, 2022: Eugene, Oregon and Hollywood, Florida – Jane’s Revenge vandalized both the Dove Medical Center pregnancy resource center and the Archdiocese of Miami’s Respect Life Office on the same day.
June 2, 2022: Des Moines, Iowa – Jane’s Revenge vandalized Agape Pregnancy Resource Center, spray-painting messages including “God loves abortion” and “fake clinic.”
June 2, 2022: Washington, D.C. – The Capitol Hill Pregnancy Center was vandalized with red paint thrown on the door, eggs thrown at windows, and spray-painted messages reading “Jane Says Revenge.”
June 7, 2022: Amherst, New York – Jane’s Revenge firebombed the CompassCare pro-life pregnancy center, one of the most serious attacks carried out by the group.
June 25, 2022: A coordinated wave of attacks struck multiple locations including Paso Robles, California; Longmont, Colorado; Winter Haven, Florida; and Lynchburg, Virginia. The Lynchburg attack targeted Blue Ridge Pregnancy Center, which attackers claimed to have chosen because “Lynchburg is a hotbed of Christian fascism” as the home of Liberty University.
June 26, 2022: Portland, Oregon – Jane’s Revenge allegedly vandalized All Saints Parish with the phrase “If abortions aren’t safe neither are you xoxo Jane.”
The attacks continued through July 2022, with incidents in Hialeah, Florida; Southfield, Michigan; St. Paul, Minnesota; and Worcester, Massachusetts. Updates on the group’s blog of further attacks ceased after July 8, 2022, though it remains unclear whether the group disbanded or merely stopped publicizing its activities.
Must See Also: Empower Your Non-Profit with Pro-Life Payment Solutions
The Violent Pro-Abortion Movement: Comprehensive Scope of Post-Dobbs Pro-Life Center Attacks
Jane’s Revenge represented only a portion of the pro-abortion violence targeting pro-life organizations following the Dobbs leak. Congressional investigators and advocacy organizations documented that more than 100 crisis pregnancy centers, pro-life organizations, and churches were attacked—some more than once—between the May 2, 2022 leak and October 2022.
At least 23 churches were firebombed, smashed, ransacked, or vandalized with pro-abortion graffiti and threatening messages during this period. An additional 58 pro-life clinics and organizations suffered similar attacks, according to Family Research Council documentation.
The House of Representatives documented dozens of specific incidents in a 2023 resolution condemning the attacks, creating a comprehensive record of the violence. The resolution detailed attacks ranging from simple vandalism to arson and firebombing, demonstrating both the geographic scope and intensity of pro-abortion militant activity.
Heidi Matzke, president of Alternatives Pregnancy Center in California, testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee in July 2022 that a man armed with a machete approached her clinic earlier that month, prompting her to hire additional security and fortify the clinic’s walls and doors. This incident illustrates how threats against pro-life centers escalated from property damage to potential violence against persons.
Must See Also: Top Payment Processing Companies for Churches
The Violent Pro-Abortion Movement vs. Historical Violence: Prosecutorial Disparities and Selective Enforcement
FACE Act Enforcement Imbalance
One of the most striking aspects of violence in the abortion debate is the dramatic disparity in how federal authorities prosecute attacks against abortion clinics versus attacks against pro-life pregnancy resource centers under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act.
The FACE Act, passed in 1994, prohibits the use of “force, threat of force, or physical obstruction” to prevent individuals from obtaining or providing reproductive health services. Critically, the statute explicitly covers both abortion clinics and pro-life pregnancy centers, defining “reproductive health services” to include “counseling or referral services relating to the human reproductive system.”
Despite this neutral statutory language, enforcement has been heavily skewed. In 2022 alone, the Department of Justice charged 26 pro-life individuals with FACE Act violations. By contrast, only five individuals were prosecuted under FACE for attacking pro-life pregnancy centers through 2024, despite over 60 documented attacks.
As of May 2023, there had been more than 60 attacks on pro-life centers with only six reported arrests—a clearance rate of less than 10%. By comparison, federal authorities have been far more aggressive in pursuing and prosecuting pro-life activists for blockades and protests at abortion facilities.
Must See Also: Christian Alternative to Classy Payment Processing
The Violent Pro-Abortion Movement: Jane’s Revenge Prosecutions
The prosecution record for Jane’s Revenge attacks further illustrates this disparity. The first two arrests in connection with the Jane’s Revenge attacks didn’t occur until January 2023—eight months after the initial wave of attacks—when federal authorities charged Caleb Freestone, 27, and Amber Smith-Stewart, 23, with spray-painting threats on pro-life clinics in Winter Haven, Hollywood, and Hialeah, Florida.
In March 2023, two additional individuals, Gabriella Oropesa and Annarella Rivera, were indicted for participating in the Florida attacks. These represented the first meaningful law enforcement actions against the dozens of attacks that had occurred across the nation.
Also in March 2023, Hannah Kamke, 39, was arrested in connection with vandalism at a pro-life pregnancy center in Amherst, New York—the same clinic that had been seriously damaged in a firebombing attack in June 2022. Additionally, Hridindu Sankar Roychowdhury, 29, was arrested for the May 2022 firebombing of Wisconsin Family Action’s Madison office, Jane’s Revenge’s first publicized attack.
Three defendants ultimately pleaded guilty to felony conspiracy charges and received prison terms, while a fourth went to trial. However, the vast majority of Jane’s Revenge attacks—likely numbering in the dozens—resulted in no arrests or prosecutions whatsoever.
Must See Also: Christian Alternative to Qgiv
The Mark Houck Case: Disproportionate Federal Response
The disparity in enforcement becomes even more stark when examining individual cases like that of Mark Houck, a pro-life activist arrested on September 23, 2022. According to his wife’s account, approximately 20-25 armed FBI agents arrived at their rural Pennsylvania home early in the morning to arrest Houck at gunpoint in front of his wife and seven children for allegedly pushing an abortion clinic volunteer.
The incident in question had occurred more than a year earlier, and local Philadelphia police had investigated the matter and declined to pursue charges due to lack of evidence. The local district attorney had also thrown out a civil suit against Houck filed by the clinic volunteer. Nevertheless, federal authorities obtained a FACE Act warrant and executed the arrest with overwhelming force.
Congressional investigators questioned the Justice Department about how many similar raids with 20-25 FBI agents had been conducted on suspects involved in the dozens of attacks on pro-life pregnancy centers and churches. The Department of Justice provided no evidence of conducting any raids of comparable scale or intensity against Jane’s Revenge suspects, despite the clear evidence of coordinated firebombings, vandalism, and terrorism.
Houck was ultimately acquitted of all charges, but the case highlighted what many perceived as a politically motivated weaponization of federal law enforcement against pro-life activists while pro-abortion extremists faced minimal consequences.
Must See Also: Why Pro-Life Businesses Need to Rethink Their Payment Processors
Trump Administration Policy Changes
Recognition of this enforcement disparity led to significant policy changes when the Trump administration took office in January 2025. The Department of Justice announced it would curtail prosecutions for blocking reproductive health care facilities, characterizing previous legal actions as instances of the “weaponization” of law enforcement.
In a memo, DOJ Chief of Staff Chad Mizelle stated that prosecutions under the FACE Act would now only occur in “extraordinary circumstances” or when there are “significant aggravating factors” involved. The memo noted that “nearly all prosecutions under the FACE Act have been against pro-life protesters. That is not the even-handed administration of justice.”
The Department immediately terminated three FACE Act cases linked to blockades of clinics in Tennessee, Pennsylvania, and Ohio. Additionally, President Trump pardoned 23 anti-abortion activists who had been convicted of blockading or physically obstructing abortion clinic entrances.
Abortion rights advocates condemned these actions as greenlighting violence against abortion providers. However, pro-life advocates argued the changes simply corrected a longstanding pattern of discriminatory enforcement where peaceful pro-life protesters faced federal prosecution while violent attacks on pro-life centers were largely ignored.
Must See Also: Pro-Life Christian Accountant Power
The Violent Pro-Abortion Movement Context: Reporting and Documentation Challenges
Several factors complicate direct comparisons between anti-abortion and pro-abortion violence statistics. The National Abortion Federation has been systematically tracking incidents against abortion providers since 1977—nearly 50 years of comprehensive documentation. By contrast, organized tracking of attacks on pro-life pregnancy centers has only recently become systematic, with organizations like the Family Research Council and Catholic Vote compiling lists beginning in 2022.
NAF acknowledges that their numbers are likely conservative as they only include incidents reported by NAF member clinics, and many facilities are not members. Similarly, the true number of attacks on pro-life centers may be higher than documented, as smaller pregnancy resource centers may lack the infrastructure to formally report all incidents.
Additionally, clinic closures following the Dobbs decision have reduced the number of targets available for anti-abortion extremists, potentially skewing recent statistics. NAF noted that comparing data to previous years is difficult due to widespread clinic closures limiting the scope of available data. Conversely, as abortion became illegal or restricted in many states, extremists shifted their focus to states where abortion remains legal, potentially concentrating violence in fewer locations.
The FBI and Department of Justice investigation of attacks on pro-life organizations noted that prosecuting threats and disruptions at pregnancy centers has been difficult because perpetrators have sought to evade identification, often wearing masks and acting during early morning hours when facilities were closed. This tactical approach by Jane’s Revenge and similar groups made investigations more challenging compared to daylight protests and blockades at abortion clinics where protesters were often identified and arrested.
Must See Also: Christian Nonprofit Merchant Services: Sustainment for Pro-Life Organizations
Conclusion: Reassessing Narratives About the Violent Pro-Abortion Movement
The evidence presented in this analysis challenges simplistic narratives that violence in the abortion debate flows in only one direction. The emergence of Jane’s Revenge and the systematic campaign of attacks against pro-life pregnancy resource centers following the Dobbs leak demonstrates that violent extremism is not the exclusive province of the pro-life movement. Over 100 pro-life facilities and churches were firebombed, vandalized, and threatened in a coordinated campaign of intimidation in 2022, with perpetrators explicitly threatening escalating violence if their demands were not met.
The stark disparity in federal prosecution—26 pro-life activists charged under FACE in 2022 alone versus only five individuals charged for attacks on pro-life centers through 2024—suggests that the perception of pro-life violence as the sole threat may be influenced as much by selective enforcement and media coverage as by the actual distribution of violent acts. When peaceful pro-life sidewalk counselors face dawn raids by 20+ FBI agents while firebombers of pregnancy centers largely evade consequences, questions of equal justice under law become unavoidable.
The organized nature of the Jane’s Revenge campaign, the explicit threats of escalating violence, and the targeting of churches and religious institutions represent a form of domestic terrorism that merits serious attention and consistent law enforcement response.
The pro-life movement has a moral obligation to unequivocally condemn violence and disavow extremists who murder in the name of protecting life. Equally, the pro-abortion movement must recognize and condemn the violence perpetrated by Jane’s Revenge and similar groups, rather than dismissing these attacks as justified responses to the overturning of Roe v. Wade.
About Pro-Life Payments: Pro-Life Payments is a Christian and Catholic credit card processing and merchant services company dedicated to serving faith-based communities and pro-life organizations. We donate 15% of our gross revenue—our “first fruits”—to support organizations committed to protecting the unborn and helping mothers in distress. By partnering with Pro-Life Payments, businesses and nonprofits can ensure their financial transactions align with their values while contributing to life-affirming causes. Every transaction processed through Pro-Life Payments automatically generates support for pregnancy resource centers, adoption agencies, and ministries that serve women facing unplanned pregnancies. Learn more about how your business can support life with every swipe.