Pro-Life Payments - Christian Merchant Services

The Bible provides clear moral boundaries on issues that contemporary culture often labels “complex” or “nuanced.” From a Christian perspective, Scripture leaves no room for ambiguity on matters of life, gender, sexuality, and human dignity. Below is a biblical analysis of four key social issues, rebutting attempts to rationalize sin through relativistic reasoning.

1. Abortion: The Sanctity of Innocent Life

Biblical Perspective: Scripture unequivocally condemns the intentional killing of innocent life (Exodus 20:13, Proverbs 6:16–19). Human beings are image-bearers of God (Genesis 1:27), and life begins at conception (Psalm 139:13–16). The Bible equates child sacrifice with abomination (Psalm 106:37–40), and modern abortion mirrors this ancient evil by treating human life as disposable1 8 12.

Demolishing the “Complexity” Argument:

“Health exceptions”: While some claim abortion is justified to save the mother’s life, advancements in medicine rarely necessitate choosing between two lives. The Bible prioritizes protecting both lives, as God alone holds authority over life and death (Deuteronomy 32:39)1 11.
“Bodily autonomy”: This secular mantra ignores the child’s distinct humanity and DNA. Ezekiel 18:4 declares, “Every living soul belongs to me”, rejecting the notion that individuals may claim ownership over another’s life 1 8.
Historical consistency: Early church writings, such as the Didache (1st century), explicitly condemned abortion, affirming the Christian witness against cultural compromise 12.

Liberals often frame abortion as a “women’s rights” issue, but Scripture frames it as a rebellion against God’s authority (Job 33:4) 1. Rationalizing abortion as “necessary” or “compassionate” denies the imago Dei in the unborn and distorts mercy into violence.

2. Transgenderism: Rejecting the Creator’s Design

Biblical Perspective: God created humans as an immutable binary: “Male and female He created them” (Genesis 1:27). The body is a sacred gift, not a malleable canvas (Psalm 100:3; 1 Corinthians 6:19–20) 4 9. Transgender ideology seeks to redefine God’s intentional design, elevating subjective feelings over biological reality 13.

Demolishing the “Identity” Argument:

“Gender fluidity”: Scripture condemns blurring gender distinctions (Deuteronomy 22:5), which were instituted to reflect Christ’s relationship with the Church (Ephesians 5:31–32) 13.
“Born in the wrong body”: This claim denies the goodness of God’s creation. A biblical theology of the body affirms that our physical form is essential to our identity, as evidenced by Christ’s incarnate resurrection (John 20:27) 9 13.
Compassion vs. truth: While gender dysphoria warrants pastoral care, affirming delusion is neither loving nor truthful. The Church must offer hope through redemption in Christ, not surgical or hormonal mutilation 9.

The liberal appeal to “inclusivity” ignores the spiritual harm of denying God’s design. Compromise here erodes the created order and undermines the gospel’s call to transformation (Romans 12:2).

3. Homosexuality: Defying Natural Law

Biblical Perspective: Homosexual acts are repeatedly condemned as sinful (Leviticus 18:22, Romans 1:26–27, 1 Corinthians 6:9–10). Marriage is exclusively defined as a union between one man and one woman (Genesis 2:24, Matthew 19:4–6) 5 10.

Demolishing the “Love Is Love” Argument:

“Genetic predisposition”: Scripture rejects determinism, emphasizing moral agency (1 Corinthians 10:13). Same-sex attraction, like all sinful inclinations, requires repentance and renewal, not normalization 5 10.
“Cultural progress”: Ancient Rome normalized same-sex relations, yet the early Church refused to capitulate, recognizing such behavior as contrary to natural law (Romans 1:26–27) 5. Modern acceptance mirrors pre-Christian paganism.
“Marriage equality”: Redefining marriage severs it from procreation and God’s covenantal model, reducing it to emotional sentiment. This destabilizes society, as evidenced by declining family cohesion 6 10.

Liberals often accuse Christians of bigotry, but biblical love “rejoices in the truth” (1 Corinthians 13:6). Affirming sin is not compassion—it is spiritual neglect.

4. Euthanasia: Usurping God’s Sovereignty

Biblical Perspective: Life is sacred and belongs solely to God (Job 12:10). Euthanasia, even when framed as “mercy,” constitutes murder (Exodus 20:13). Suffering, though grievous, is not meaningless but can refine faith (Romans 5:3–5) 7 14 15.

Demolishing the “Compassionate Choice” Argument:

“Dignity in death”: Human dignity derives from bearing God’s image, not physical autonomy. King Saul’s suicide was condemned (1 Samuel 31:4), and Scripture calls us to protect the vulnerable, not eliminate them 11 15.
“Quality of life”: This utilitarian metric rejects the inherent worth of the disabled, elderly, or terminally ill. Christ’s ministry prioritized those society deemed “useless” (Luke 14:13–14) 14.
Slippery slope: Legalizing euthanasia exploits the suffering for economic convenience, as seen in nations like Canada, where patients fear coerced death 14.

The Church must advocate for palliative care, not surrender to despair. God’s grace sustains even in suffering (2 Corinthians 12:9).

Conclusion: Boldness in Truth

The world insists morality is gray, but Scripture proclaims, “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil” (Isaiah 5:20). Compromise in the 1980s on issues like no-fault divorce and homosexuality paved the way for today’s moral chaos 6. Christians must reject false humility that equivocates on sin. Truth is not a spectrum—it is rooted in the character of God, who declares, “I the Lord do not change” (Malachi 3:6). Our task is not to rationalize sin but to redeem sinners through the gospel, offering forgiveness and transformation in Christ (2 Corinthians 5:17).

Christian Merchant Card Services

Pro Life Payments is the for-profit arm of the pro-life movement. Pro-Life Payments is reducing abortion in America by turning customer financial transactions into pro-life funding. We give 15% of gross revenue to Pro-Life organizations. Payments is transitioning donation platforms, credit card processing and peer to peer payments into a funding engine for the pro-life community. Pro-Life Payments is providing customers with the alternative to the abortion-supporting financial institutions and payment processors they are supporting today.
Citations: