Pro-Life Payments

198:1 abortion-to-adoption ratio

Planned Parenthood’s annual reports reveal stark disparities between abortion services and adoption referrals, highlighting organizational priorities that critics argue prioritize abortion over alternative pregnancy resolutions. An analysis of publicly available data from recent fiscal years demonstrates significant imbalances in service allocation and resource distribution.

Abortion-to-Adoption Ratios: A Decade of Trends

– In 2019-2020, Planned Parenthood performed 383,460 abortions while providing 1,940 adoption referrals—a ratio of 198 abortions for every adoption referral [2].
– By 2021-2022, abortions rose to 392,715 (a 5% increase), while adoption referral data for this period remains unreported [4].
– Over the past decade, Planned Parenthood has performed 3.4 million abortions compared to approximately 27,000 adoption referrals—a long-term ratio of 126 abortions per referral [2].

Service Declines and Abortion Expansion

Non-abortion services have sharply declined, further illustrating shifting priorities:
– Prenatal care: Dropped 72% since 2010 [2].
– Cancer screenings: Fell 74% (breast exams down 77%, pap tests down 74%) [2].
– Contraceptive services: Decreased 41% since 2010 [2].
– Total patients: Declined by 28% (840,000 fewer individuals served) [2].

Despite these reductions, abortion services grew by 20% over the past decade, now constituting 96.6% of Planned Parenthood’s pregnancy resolution services [2] [4].

Financial Incentives and Organizational Growth

Planned Parenthood’s financial trajectory aligns with its service trends:
– Revenue: Increased to $2.1 billion in 2022-23, up from $1.7 billion in 2020-21 [4] [2].
– Net assets: Surpassed $2.5 billion in 2022-23 [4].
– Taxpayer funding: Government grants and Medicaid reimbursements totaled $670.4 million in 2020-21 [2].

Critics argue these financial gains correlate with abortion expansion. For context, if each abortion generated even $500 in revenue (a conservative estimate), the 392,715 abortions in 2021-22 would represent at least $196 million in income—nearly 10% of total revenue [4].

Structural Motivations and Ethical Debates

The data fuels arguments that Planned Parenthood’s operational model inherently favors abortion:

Economic Efficiency: Abortion procedures are faster and more profitable than coordinating adoption referrals, which require partnerships with external agencies and long-term support [2].
Political Advocacy: Planned Parenthood has increasingly positioned itself as a global abortion advocate, expanding overseas programs in countries restricting abortion [1] [3].
Mission Drift: While founded to provide family planning, abortions now dominate services despite declining contraceptive care and cancer screenings [2] [4].

Conclusion

Quantitative evidence from annual reports suggests Planned Parenthood’s activities disproportionately emphasize abortion over alternatives like adoption. While the organization maintains it offers comprehensive options counseling, the 198:1 abortion-to-adoption ratio and concurrent financial growth amid service cuts raise questions about institutional incentives. As debates continue, these metrics underscore deeper tensions between stated missions of “care” and the economic realities of healthcare provision.

Citations: